Skip to main content

IPR disputes and Market Court proceedings

Your experienced representative in Market Court proceedings

The Finnish Market Court is a specialised court that handles disputes and administrative matters relating to industrial property rights and copyright, as well as matters concerning marketing supervision and unfair business practices.

In recent years, Berggren has been involved in a significant share of IPR-related Market Court proceedings in Finland. This experience enables us to provide clients with reliable representation and in-depth insight that serves a wide range of needs.

Several of our experts have completed the Finnish Bar Examination, and all our lawyers meet the qualification requirements for court representation before general and specialised courts, including the Supreme Court.

Contact us

Kaisa Fahllund

Lawyer, Team Leader

Emilia Hodge

VP Legal Services, Lawyer

Berggren2026©HenniHyvärinen-2583

Why Berggren?

Extensive litigation experience

We have handled numerous trademark, design, domain name and patent matters before the Market Court, including preliminary injunctions, final judgments and appeals.

IPR expertise combined with business understanding

We combine in-depth IPR expertise, sector-specific business understanding and strategic litigation tactics. One of our strengths is our ability to bring together broader expert teams when needed, combining legal experience with, for example, deep technical understanding across different fields of technology.

Transparency and predictability

We provide a realistic assessment of the prospects of success and the expected costs of the proceedings, helping our clients make well-considered decisions.

Benefits of Market Court proceedings

The Market Court provides a specialised forum for IPR matters, combining legal expertise, sector-specific understanding and effective legal remedies. For businesses, this can mean a more predictable process, better risk management and stronger protection in situations where a brand, technology, design or other intangible asset needs to be defended.

 

Specialisation in IPR matters

The Market Court handles both disputes and administrative matters relating to, among other things, copyright, trademarks, designs, domain names, utility models and patents. The court also decides matters concerning unfair business practices and marketing supervision. Under certain conditions, the Market Court may also examine other civil matters in connection with disputes that fall within its jurisdiction. 

In-depth expertise and predictable case law

The composition of the Market Court may include, in addition to judges, up to two expert members where the nature of the matter so requires. The expertise of a specialised court improves the quality of decisions and reduces legal uncertainty. Established case law helps assess risks and anticipate the course of proceedings. 

Effective legal protection and a simplified appeal process

The Market Court may impose effective prohibitions and sanctions, such as prohibiting the use of an infringing trademark, design or marketing message. This provides companies with swift and effective protection against various types of infringement.

Decisions of the Market Court are appealed directly to the Supreme Court, which can help limit the overall costs of the proceedings.

How we can help?

  • Trademark disputes

  • Design right disputes

  • Disputes relating to domain names and other naming rights

  • Copyright disputes

  • Patent and utility model disputes

  • Administrative proceedings and appeals

  • Unfair business practices

  • Marketing supervision proceedings

  • Preliminary injunctions and other interim measures

  • Trade secret disputes

Berggren_Innovation_-gigapixel-standard-scale-4_00x

Market Court proceedings we have handled

Berggren’s experts have assisted clients in several Market Court proceedings relating to intellectual property rights and marketing law. Below are examples of matters we have handled.

MAO:221/2025
Solera Oy v. Oy Hartwall Ab
Subject matter: domain name, transfer of a domain name to the rights holder and acceptable grounds

MAO:140/2025
R-Group Baltic OÜ v. Exmet OÜ and Exmet PA OÜ
Subject matter: patent infringement

MAO:678/2024
Frends Technology Oy v. Frendy Oy and Frendy Group Oy
Subject matter: trademark, trademark infringement, trade name and trade name infringement

MAO:600/2024
Joma Sport, S.A. v. FunMax Oy
Subject matter: trademark, likelihood of confusion and cancellation of registration

MAO:493/2024
Suomen Jääkiekkoliitto ry and Finlands Ishockeyförbund rf v. Tammer Brands Oy
Subject matter: trademark infringement

How can we help?

How can we help?

If you have any questions or would like to give feedback, our team is ready to help!

Contact us
Person sitting in a chair holding a coffee mug.